Petition To UK Supreme Court
We the undersigned, support Ms Ella Gareeva, her own and other children, in her request that the UK Supreme Court commits to review the case as represented via Document A (link) and associated bundle of evidence.
We submit that justice has been perverted and it is a matter of nationwide public interest, if not also, national security, that the weight of lawfully evidenced suspicion, related crime and/or criminal negligence, be professionally and legally addressed, in interest of child protection and for purpose of establishing a legal precedent to restrict the powers of UK Family Courts, in asmuch as, police, social services & local authorities shall no longer remain at liberty to bury children's crime reports, evidence and suspects, behind a veil of silence & secrecy and with no accountability to either the public nor, any higher authority.
Document A exposes suspicions related to Crimes Against Humanity, supported by medical evidence and two child-witness-victims highly detailed disclosures to London police and other parties, coupled with (among other professional & official reports), the United Nations Child Protection Committee's confirmation (July 2014), that all such crimes as disclosed, are happening in Britain and that abusers are at liberty to operate 'with impunity' due to 'very low' arrest rates of suspects involved in organised crimes against children, which include; organised sexual, physical & emotional abuse, illegal & medical drugs, 'organ-harvesting', torture & murder, child trafficking, making & selling of photo's, videos and other gruesome artifacts created via aforementioned crimes.
Document A also exposes lawfully evidenced suspicion that suspects involved in organised crimes against children/Crimes Against Humanity, are abusing their powers of public office, professions, businesses etc., not only to commit crimes against children but also, to collectively conspire in concealing their crimes, destroying evidence, forewarning suspects, engaging in malicious prosecutions against victims and witnesses and perverting the course of justice.
We are in no doubt that organised criminals can and do operate and staff, the very authorities witness-victims turn to for help; Britain's children are thereby placed at a very high risk in terms of access to justice and lawful protection from suspects, precisely because inherent ignorance of multiple historical cases, have facilitated a gaping 'legal' loophole, which permits criminal or negligent authorities to investigate themselves and/or benefit from guaranteed privacy by order of the Family Courts. Powerful criminals are known to use methods of blackmail, threats & bribery as a means of controlling or silencing any among their peers asking questions.
In light of above concerns, we request that the Supreme Court takes into consideration the lawfully evidenced suspicion that this case is presently, only within jurisdiction of UK Family Courts, as a perversion of the course of justice, that the case was submitted to CCRC for Review and was rejected due to the case not first, having been through Appeal. Ms Gareeva is denied any right of Appeal by same Family Court Judge, Mrs Justice Pauffley, who decreed the case a "hoax" and who subsequently, handed two child witness-victims into care of a known and uninvestigated suspect, a beneficiary of positive-discrimination alongside 70+ named & known others, cited as his criminal accomplices.
Regardless of whether or not one person or another believes children's crime reports, children have rights and their crime reports are worthy of the same legal attention & legal rights as granted to adults i.e. Pace Code G is not a 'fantasy'. Ms Gareeva, her own and other children, have suffered what amounts to an abomination of justice via callously negative and vindictive levels of police and local authority discrimination, ignorance and unfounded supposition that all the suspects are innocent and the two child witnesses, were lying.
We submit, it is now beholden on Britain's Supreme Court to assess the balance of law & rights in this case which itself, has set its own 'precedent' whereby, organised abusers on strength of ignorance of lawful procedure and via supposition, are at liberty to literally get away with murder via abuse of powers to extent, the law is reversed; suspects become 'victims' and victims are rendered 'suspect'.
Thus, the lawful evidence & suspicion now citing this total reversal of law acting to protect lawfully identified suspects and leave children at continued risk, truly is, a matter of National Security and with no UK authority beyond the Supreme Court, having powers to address all such issue and ongoing suspicion as presented herein.
We are in no doubt that when it comes to safeguarding children, Britain is facing a crisis of crime & corruption that has reached pandemic proportions and with organised abuse of children, being a key component in gaining control within all stratas of UK authorities and to such a level, that prior to his re-election in 2019, Mr Johnson as a British Prime Minister, could casually state to UK media that he considers police investigations into historical cases of child sexual as "money spaffed up the wall" and with no regard for the indisputable fact, that many historical crime reports have faciltitated arrest of suspects and rescue of other children suffering present-day abuse via those same suspects.
We submit that it is not "money" being "spaffed up the wall" in Britain, it is children's rights, lives and futures. This situation will not change without a stringent 'tightening-up' of Britain's Child Protection Protocols. The severe discrepancies as exposed within Document A, provide a perfect opportunity to deliver that vitally necessary change.
Sign The UK Supreme Court Petition